Norton v. Hartford

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Norton v. Hartford

113 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4840

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJanuary 2, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 113 F. 1023 (Norton v. Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. Hartford, 113 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4840 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in the second suit may take an injunction pendente lite as prayed, provided he will file security in the amount of $150,000, conditioned that he will pay whatever may be found due from him to the estate of George P. Gilman, with leave to the defendants to move to have the security increased, if the cause be not submitted to the court on final hearing during the year 1902, by reason of any delay on the part of complainant. If such security he given, and injunction order taken, the motion for a receiver in the first suit will be denied. If said Hartford elects not to give such security, the motion for injunction in the second suit will be denied, and the court will, in the first suit, appoint George H. Hartford and another person, to he selected by the court, joint receivers as prayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in the second suit may take an injunction pendente lite as prayed, provided he will file security in the amount of $150,000, conditioned that he will pay whatever may be found due from him to the estate of George P. Gilman, with leave to the defendants to move to have the security increased, if the cause be not submitted to the court on final hearing during the year 1902, by reason of any delay on the part of complainant. If such security he given, and injunction order taken, the motion for a receiver in the first suit will be denied. If said Hartford elects not to give such security, the motion for injunction in the second suit will be denied, and the court will, in the first suit, appoint George H. Hartford and another person, to he selected by the court, joint receivers as prayed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-hartford-circtsdny-1902.