Norton v. Cromwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Norton v. Cromwell

248 A.D. 707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 248 A.D. 707 (Norton v. Cromwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. Cromwell, 248 A.D. 707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting motion of defendant-respondent for the issuance of a commission to take testimony of certain parties in London, England, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. There is no authority, statutory or otherwise, for the examination of a party or witness on a preliminary motion separate and apart from a trial. (Matter of Erlanger, 231 App. Div. 70, 72.) Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, Townley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting motion of defendant-respondent for the issuance of a commission to take testimony of certain parties in London, England, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. There is no authority, statutory or otherwise, for the examination of a party or witness on a preliminary motion separate and apart from a trial. (Matter of Erlanger, 231 App. Div. 70, 72.) Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, Townley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-cromwell-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack