Norton v. Courtney
53 Cal. 691
This text of 53 Cal. 691 (Norton v. Courtney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Norton v. Courtney, 53 Cal. 691 (Cal. 1879).
Opinion
The assessment and diagram, as recorded, contain no sufficient description of the premises—there being a material variance between the diagram as recorded and that attached to the original assessment.
Order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Blanchard v. Ladd
67 P. 131 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
Labs v. Cooper
40 P. 1042 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Gillis v. Cleveland
25 P. 351 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
53 Cal. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-courtney-cal-1879.