Norton v. Beckman

55 N.W. 603, 53 Minn. 456, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 359
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 8, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 55 N.W. 603 (Norton v. Beckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norton v. Beckman, 55 N.W. 603, 53 Minn. 456, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 359 (Mich. 1893).

Opinion

Gilfillan, C. J.

The judgment in this case was perhaps in some respects informal but it was sufficient in substance, for it expressed the decision of the court on the matter involved, and the relief granted. It would have been good as a judgment either in the District or in a Justice’s Court.

In proceedings under 1878 G. S. ch. 84, the pleadings are to be construed, and are to have the same effect, as in a “civil action.” When the answer expressly, or by failing to deny, admits the allegations in the complaint, the admission is equivalent to proof. Hennessey v. Pederson, 28 Minn. 461, (11 N. W. Rep. 63,) did not decide otherwise, but that, under that chapter, judgment cannot be taken by default without proof of the allegations in the complaint, as is the case in certain civil actions. It follows that if the answer admits the material allegations in the complaint, and alleges no defense, the court may render judgment on the pleadings, as in other cases. There is in such case nothing to try, except by the allegations and admissions in the pleadings.

The only other points in the case deserving mention, to wit, that an equitable defense was alleged, and that, because the • municipal court could not try such defense, it ought to have certified the cause to the district court, are fully disposed of by Petsch v. Biggs, 31 Minn. 392, (18 N. W. Rep. 101,) in which it was held that equitable matter, which requires affirmative relief to be a defense per se, can[460]*460not be interposed in proceedings under chapter 84, but that the defendant must first obtain that equitable relief 'in a court competent to give it, and also that the case cannot be certified to the district court because of such equitable matter being interposed. That case came up from the municipal court of St. Paul, but in this respect there is no difference between the provisions of the act establishing that court, and those of the act establishing the municipal court of Duluth.

Order and judgment affirmed.

Vanderburgh, J., took no part in the decision.

(Opinion published 55 N. W. Rep. 603.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LaFleur v. Schiff
58 N.W.2d 320 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1953)
Dahlberg v. Young
42 N.W.2d 570 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1950)
Clark v. Dye
197 N.W. 209 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1924)
William Weisman Holding Co. v. Miller
188 N.W. 732 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1922)
Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co.
148 N.W. 565 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
Upton v. Merriman
142 N.W. 150 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)
Tilleny v. Knoblauch
75 N.W. 1039 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1898)
Lundberg v. Davidson
71 N.W. 395 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1897)
Lloyd v. Secord
63 N.W. 1099 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 N.W. 603, 53 Minn. 456, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-beckman-minn-1893.