Norton v. Anderson
100 S.E. 638, 24 Ga. App. 267, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 545
This text of 100 S.E. 638 (Norton v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Norton v. Anderson, 100 S.E. 638, 24 Ga. App. 267, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 545 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
The only question raised by the exceptions in this ease is whether the evidence authorized the verdict. Upon a careful examination of the evidence we cannot say that the verdict was without evidence to support it. The trial judge having approved the verdict, it was not error to overrule1 the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 638, 24 Ga. App. 267, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-anderson-gactapp-1919.