Norton L. Rinne, D.D.S. v. Black & Decker Corporation, a Maryland Corporation
This text of 45 F.3d 433 (Norton L. Rinne, D.D.S. v. Black & Decker Corporation, a Maryland Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
45 F.3d 433
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Norton L. RINNE, D.D.S., Appellant,
v.
BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation, Appellee.
No. 94-2134NE.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 12, 1994.
Filed: Dec. 21, 1994.
Before ARNOLD, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and WILSON,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the record and the parties' briefs and having heard oral argument, we find no error that would require reversal in this personal injury diversity action. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 F.3d 433, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-l-rinne-dds-v-black-decker-corporation-a-ma-ca8-1994.