Norton ex rel. Norton v. Hale

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Norton ex rel. Norton v. Hale

507 So. 2d 827, 1987 La. LEXIS 9332

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 5, 1987

DocketNo. 87-C-0978

StatusPublished

This text of 507 So. 2d 827 (Norton ex rel. Norton v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton ex rel. Norton v. Hale, 507 So. 2d 827, 1987 La. LEXIS 9332 (La. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The judgment maintaining the exception of no cause of action is set aside. The case is remanded to the district court to permit plaintiff to amend her petition to allege (1) a demand for worker’s compensation benefits based on her dependency, if the minor was in the course of employment with defendant Hale, or (2) an alternative demand for recovery in tort, if, as alleged in the codefendant’s answer, the minor was not in the course of his employment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The judgment maintaining the exception of no cause of action is set aside. The case is remanded to the district court to permit plaintiff to amend her petition to allege (1) a demand for worker’s compensation benefits based on her dependency, if the minor was in the course of employment with defendant Hale, or (2) an alternative demand for recovery in tort, if, as alleged in the codefendant’s answer, the minor was not in the course of his employment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 So. 2d 827, 1987 La. LEXIS 9332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-ex-rel-norton-v-hale-la-1987.