Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 2, 2008
DocketAP-75,880
StatusPublished

This text of Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee (Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-75,880

EX PARTE DONN LEE NORTON Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 17823-361 IN THE 361ST DISTRICT COURT FROM BRAZOS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

habitation with intent to commit theft and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.

Applicant contends that he is being improperly denied street time credit on this sentence. If

a person has served more than half his remaining time from the date of conditional release from

TDCJ to the date of the issuance of a parole revocation (blue) warrant, he may be entitled to credit

towards his sentence for time served while on parole. Tex. Gov’t Code §508.283(c). The trial court determined that since Applicant is serving a sentence for first degree burglary, he is ineligible for

street time credit under Tex. Gov’t Code §508.263(b). This Court has previously determined that

a person convicted of first degree burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft prior to the

change in the Penal Code making such an offense a second degree felony is eligible for street time

credit. Ex Parte Mabry, 137 S.W.3d 58 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Applicant’s offense falls within

this category and does not disqualify him for consideration of street time credit. Applicant is also

serving two other sentences, but those are immaterial to the determination of Applicant’s claim in

this cause. None of Applicant’s offenses are described by Tex. Gov’t Code §508.149(a) and make

him ineligible for street time credit under Tex. Gov’t Code §508.283(b).

The trial court obtained affidavits from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to answer

Applicant’s claim. TDCJ states that Applicant was released on parole for this cause on July 3, 1998

with a maximum discharge date of May 6, 2005 (on this offense). That would make his mid-point

for parole in this case December 4, 2001. Applicant was out of custody until a parole revocation

(blue) warrant issued for his arrest on November 27, 2002. Applicant served more than one-half of

his remaining sentence on parole prior to the parole revocation warrant being issued and is entitled

to credit for this street time in this cause.

Relief is granted. Applicant is to receive time credit in this cause for the time he was released

from July 3, 1998 to when the parole revocation warrant was issued in November 27, 2002.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: April 2, 2008 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Mabry
137 S.W.3d 58 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-ex-parte-donn-lee-texcrimapp-2008.