Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee
This text of Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee (Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-75,880
EX PARTE DONN LEE NORTON Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 17823-361 IN THE 361ST DISTRICT COURT FROM BRAZOS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a
habitation with intent to commit theft and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.
Applicant contends that he is being improperly denied street time credit on this sentence. If
a person has served more than half his remaining time from the date of conditional release from
TDCJ to the date of the issuance of a parole revocation (blue) warrant, he may be entitled to credit
towards his sentence for time served while on parole. Tex. Gov’t Code §508.283(c). The trial court determined that since Applicant is serving a sentence for first degree burglary, he is ineligible for
street time credit under Tex. Gov’t Code §508.263(b). This Court has previously determined that
a person convicted of first degree burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft prior to the
change in the Penal Code making such an offense a second degree felony is eligible for street time
credit. Ex Parte Mabry, 137 S.W.3d 58 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Applicant’s offense falls within
this category and does not disqualify him for consideration of street time credit. Applicant is also
serving two other sentences, but those are immaterial to the determination of Applicant’s claim in
this cause. None of Applicant’s offenses are described by Tex. Gov’t Code §508.149(a) and make
him ineligible for street time credit under Tex. Gov’t Code §508.283(b).
The trial court obtained affidavits from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to answer
Applicant’s claim. TDCJ states that Applicant was released on parole for this cause on July 3, 1998
with a maximum discharge date of May 6, 2005 (on this offense). That would make his mid-point
for parole in this case December 4, 2001. Applicant was out of custody until a parole revocation
(blue) warrant issued for his arrest on November 27, 2002. Applicant served more than one-half of
his remaining sentence on parole prior to the parole revocation warrant being issued and is entitled
to credit for this street time in this cause.
Relief is granted. Applicant is to receive time credit in this cause for the time he was released
from July 3, 1998 to when the parole revocation warrant was issued in November 27, 2002.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: April 2, 2008 Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Norton, Ex Parte Donn Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-ex-parte-donn-lee-texcrimapp-2008.