NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
This text of 379 U.S. 132 (NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. Interstate Commerce Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.
v.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Randolph Karr for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., and Robert W. Ginnane for the Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; J. Thomason Phelps for Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; Boris H. Lakusta for the City of San Rafael et al.; and Frederick G. Pfrommer for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
379 U.S. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwestern-pacific-railroad-co-v-interstate-commerce-commission-scotus-1965.