Northwestern Ohio Poultry Ass'n v. Schneider

205 N.E.2d 905, 2 Ohio St. 2d 34, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 18, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 479
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 1965·No. No. 38715·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The operation performed by the appellee for its poultry-farmer members is a processing and preparing to a suitable condition for market and sale, and the purchase and use of the items in question, used and consumed in such operation, which are the basis for the taxes levied by the Board of Tax Appeals, are excepted from taxation by Sections 5739.01 and 5741.01, Revised Code.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Glander, Tax [36] Commr., 149 Ohio St. 120, and France Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 143 Ohio St. 455.

Judgment affirmed.

Taut, C. J., Smith, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert and BrowN, JJ., concur. SchNeider, J., not participating. Smith, J., of the Six Appellate District, sitting for Zimmerman, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northwestern Ohio Poultry Ass'n v. Schneider, 205 N.E.2d 905, 2 Ohio St. 2d 34, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 18, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 479 (Ohio 1965).

205 N.E.2d 905 (Northwestern Ohio Poultry Ass'n v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

General Mills, Inc. v. Limbach
520 N.E.2d 218 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
Byrd and Frederickson, Inc. v. Forst
33 Va. Cir. 496 (Rockingham County Circuit Court, 1974)
Gressel Produce Co. v. Kosydar
297 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1973)
Custom Beverage Packers, Inc. v. Kosydar
294 N.E.2d 672 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1973)
Scholz Homes, Inc. v. Porterfield
266 N.E.2d 834 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1971)
Undercofler v. MacOn Linen Service, Inc.
150 S.E.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)