Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Murray

10 R.I. Dec. 26
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJuly 6, 1933
DocketEq. No. 10737
StatusPublished

This text of 10 R.I. Dec. 26 (Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Murray, 10 R.I. Dec. 26 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon bill, answer and proof.

Bill brought to cancel a life insurance policy issued by complainant on the life of Thomas F. Fallon September 30, 1929, for the sum of $2,000, on the ground that certain answers made by said Fallon in his application for said policy were false.

The specific questions to which the answers are alleged false are:

“10. Have you had since childhood any of the following diseases or symptoms?
“D. High blood pressure, disease of heart or blood vessels, enlarged veins, anemia, or other diseases of the blood?”
To which the answer was “No”.
“15. Give below the name and address of every doctor * * * who has examined, prescribed for or treated you in the past five years.
“Give full particulars. If none, so state.”
The answer was “None since childhood”.

There is no question that the above answers were false.

This question is so fully discussed in two opinions of our Supreme Court recently handed down, viz.: The Prudential Insurance Co. of America vs. Tanenbaum, and Columbian National Life Ins. Co. vs. Industrial Trust Co., numbered 1018 and 1131 respectively, that it is unnecessary to write an elaborate rescript.

The bill is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 R.I. Dec. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwestern-mutual-life-insurance-v-murray-risuperct-1933.