Northwestern Brewing Co. v. Alley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Northwestern Brewing Co. v. Alley

64 Ill. App. 516, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 954

DecidedJune 1, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 64 Ill. App. 516 (Northwestern Brewing Co. v. Alley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northwestern Brewing Co. v. Alley, 64 Ill. App. 516, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 954 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

From an examination of the abstract and briefs filed in this cause, we are of the opinion that the finding of the court should be sustained. Only questions of fact are involved.

We think that the court was justified in concluding that appellant immediately upon the setting aside to the judgment debtor of the articles claimed as exempt by him, seized all the property in the saloon; that it prevented the removal of such property, directed that the keys should not be given to the plaintiff, and never returned or offered to return the same, although a demand was afterward made by appellee for the property claimed by him. We do not find the evidence such that we would be warranted in reversing the conclusion of the Circuit Court; its judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

From an examination of the abstract and briefs filed in this cause, we are of the opinion that the finding of the court should be sustained. Only questions of fact are involved.

We think that the court was justified in concluding that appellant immediately upon the setting aside to the judgment debtor of the articles claimed as exempt by him, seized all the property in the saloon; that it prevented the removal of such property, directed that the keys should not be given to the plaintiff, and never returned or offered to return the same, although a demand was afterward made by appellee for the property claimed by him. We do not find the evidence such that we would be warranted in reversing the conclusion of the Circuit Court; its judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Ill. App. 516, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwestern-brewing-co-v-alley-illappct-1896.