Northwest Ohio Grievance Committee v. Archer

Ohio Supreme Court

Northwest Ohio Grievance Committee v. Archer

2015 Ohio 79, 24 N.E.3d 1174, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1255

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 13, 2015

Docket2010-2270

StatusPublished

This text of 2015 Ohio 79 (Northwest Ohio Grievance Committee v. Archer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northwest Ohio Grievance Committee v. Archer, 2015 Ohio 79, 24 N.E.3d 1174, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1255 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Stephen Robert Archer, Attorney Registration No. 0031376, last known address in Defiance, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 5, 2011, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

*1256 {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’Connor, C.J., and PfeifeR, O’Donnell, LanzingeR, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Stephen Robert Archer, Attorney Registration No. 0031376, last known address in Defiance, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 5, 2011, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

*1256 {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’Connor, C.J., and PfeifeR, O’Donnell, LanzingeR, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2015 Ohio 79, 24 N.E.3d 1174, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwest-ohio-grievance-committee-v-archer-ohio-2015.