Northwest Guardianship Services v. Nesbitt
This text of 35 F. App'x 694 (Northwest Guardianship Services v. Nesbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Patricia Nesbitt and Woodrow Burley appeal pro se the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice the Washington state unlawful detainer action which Burley attempted to remove. We have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We vacate the district court’s order and dismiss the federal proceedings for lack of jurisdiction.
VACATED and DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 F. App'x 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwest-guardianship-services-v-nesbitt-ca9-2002.