Northwest Graphics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. Circuit

Northwest Graphics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

156 F. App'x 331

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 2005

DocketNo. 04-1363

StatusPublished

This text of 156 F. App'x 331 (Northwest Graphics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northwest Graphics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 156 F. App'x 331 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. The court has determined the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). We have considered petitioner’s arguments, and find them utterly without merit. The record easily supports the Board’s decisions. See 29 U.S.C. § 160(e) (Board’s factual findings are “conclusive” upon this court if “supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole”); Tualatin Elec., Inc. v. NLRB, 253 F.3d 714, 717 (D.C.Cir.2001) (“We uphold the Board’s legal determinations so long as they are neither arbitrary nor inconsistent with established law.”). It is therefore

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied and the cross-application for enforcement is granted.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. The court has determined the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). We have considered petitioner’s arguments, and find them utterly without merit. The record easily supports the Board’s decisions. See 29 U.S.C. § 160(e) (Board’s factual findings are “conclusive” upon this court if “supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole”); Tualatin Elec., Inc. v. NLRB, 253 F.3d 714, 717 (D.C.Cir.2001) (“We uphold the Board’s legal determinations so long as they are neither arbitrary nor inconsistent with established law.”). It is therefore

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied and the cross-application for enforcement is granted.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 F. App'x 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwest-graphics-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board-cadc-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack