Northwest By-Products Co. v. Minnesota State Board of Health
This text of 163 N.W.2d 778 (Northwest By-Products Co. v. Minnesota State Board of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Petitioner, Northwest By-Products Company, Inc., was notified by the State Board of Health that on September 9, 1968, it would conduct a hearing on the complaint of the St. Cloud Board of Health that petitioner was “operating an offensive trade in violation of Minnesota Statutes 1967, Section 145.17,” the so-called “Offensive Trade Act,” at its location in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Minn. St. 145.17, so far as applicable here, provides:
“No person without the written permission of the board of health of the town, village, or city, shall engage therein in any trade or employment which is hurtful to the inhabitants, or dangerous to the public health, or injurious to neighboring property, or from which noisome odors arise.”
Upon the representation of petitioner that the board was acting beyond its authorized jurisdiction, we issued a writ of prohibition suspending further proceedings until the further order of this court. Thereafter, briefs [230]*230were submitted by the parties and arguments were heard for and against making the writ permanent.
We have considered the briefs submitted by the parties, together with their oral arguments. It is petitioner’s primary contention that the authority of the board to act pursuant to § 145.17 has been preempted by enactment of the so-called “Pollution Control Act,” L. 1967, c. 882 (Minn. St. c. 116), and Ex. Sess. L. 1967, c. 48, § 43, which relate to the creation of the Pollution Control Agency and cooperation between it and the State Board of Health on overlapping functions.
We conclude from an examination of these provisions that they contain nothing which would deprive the State Board of Health of jurisdiction to proceed with the hearing provided for in its notice to petitioner. McMillan v. State Board of Health, 110 Minn. 145, 124 N. W. 828; 1 Am. Jur. (2d) Administrative Law, § § 42,70.
The writ of prohibition issued here is accordingly discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 N.W.2d 778, 282 Minn. 229, 1969 Minn. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northwest-by-products-co-v-minnesota-state-board-of-health-minn-1969.