Northup v. Gage

New York Court of Appeals

Northup v. Gage

155 N.E.2d 864, 5 N.Y.2d 863

DecidedNovember 21, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 155 N.E.2d 864 (Northup v. Gage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northup v. Gage, 155 N.E.2d 864, 5 N.Y.2d 863 (N.Y. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs payable by defendant Ulmer and with costs to defendant Gage payable by plaintiffs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges" Desmond, Fuld, Froessel and Burke. Judges Dye and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint against defendant Ulmer upon the ground that as a matter of law the accident resulted solely from the negligence of defendant Gage.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs payable by defendant Ulmer and with costs to defendant Gage payable by plaintiffs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges" Desmond, Fuld, Froessel and Burke. Judges Dye and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint against defendant Ulmer upon the ground that as a matter of law the accident resulted solely from the negligence of defendant Gage.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 N.E.2d 864, 5 N.Y.2d 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northup-v-gage-ny-1958.