Northrup's Lessee v. Brehmer
This text of 8 Ohio 392 (Northrup's Lessee v. Brehmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
This case involves merely the construction of the statutes for the recording of deeds. The statutes provide that unless an older deed shall be recorded within six months of its execution, it shall be deemed fraudulent against a subsequent bona fide purchaser without notice. Neither of these deeds were recorded within six months of their execution, but the last was executed before the first was recorded, and as to that, in the absence of all evidence of notice, the first must be held fraudulent. We do not see how the omission to record the last deed affects the question; there is no claim by a later purchaser without notice. The plaintiff will have judgment, but the defendant is entitled to the benefit of the occupying claimant law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ohio 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northrups-lessee-v-brehmer-ohio-1838.