Northrup v. Witkowski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Northrup v. Witkowski

173 A.3d 392, 327 Conn. 971

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedNovember 21, 2017

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 173 A.3d 392 (Northrup v. Witkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northrup v. Witkowski, 173 A.3d 392, 327 Conn. 971 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 175 Conn. App. 223, 167 A.3d 443 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the maintenance and repair of storm water systems is a discretionary duty, in light of this state's precedents, including Spitzer v. Waterbury, 113 Conn. 84, 154 A. 157 (1931), and Silberstein v. 54 Hillcrest Park Associates, LLC, 135 Conn. App. 262, 41 A.3d 1147 (2012) ?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 175 Conn. App. 223, 167 A.3d 443 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the maintenance and repair of storm water systems is a discretionary duty, in light of this state's precedents, including Spitzer v. Waterbury, 113 Conn. 84, 154 A. 157 (1931), and Silberstein v. 54 Hillcrest Park Associates, LLC, 135 Conn. App. 262, 41 A.3d 1147 (2012) ?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.3d 392, 327 Conn. 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northrup-v-witkowski-conn-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack