Northrup v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Northrup v. State

418 So. 2d 420, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20925

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 20, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2325

StatusPublished

This text of 418 So. 2d 420 (Northrup v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northrup v. State, 418 So. 2d 420, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a conviction for the crimes of burglary, grand theft, and possession of burglary tools, we find no error in the trial judge’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress.

However, as the state concedes, the sentence must be corrected to eliminate the requirement that the defendant pay $100 in court costs and contribute $10 to the crime victim fund. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976); Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); § 939.15, Fla.Stat. (1981).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the conviction but REMAND with instructions that the sentence be corrected to delete the requirement that the defendant pay court costs and contribute to the crime victim fund.

DANAHY, A. C. J., SCHOONOVER, J., and CURTIS, CLINTON A., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI