Northrop v. Poughkeepsie City & Wappingers Falls Electric Railway Co.
This text of 74 A.D. 625 (Northrop v. Poughkeepsie City & Wappingers Falls Electric Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground of the error (folio 135 of the case) involved in the refusal of the court to charge that if the jury find that if the plaintiff had looked and listened, and by so doing he would have avoided the accident, then he cannot recover, although the defendant may also be guilty of negligence. All concurred, except Goodrich, P. J., who dissented on the ground that the previous portion of the charge properly instructed the jury, taken in connection with the modification stated by the court at the time of this request.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 A.D. 625, 77 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northrop-v-poughkeepsie-city-wappingers-falls-electric-railway-co-nyappdiv-1902.