Northrop v. Poughkeepsie City & Wappingers Falls Electric Railway Co.

74 A.D. 625, 77 N.Y.S. 1134
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 A.D. 625 (Northrop v. Poughkeepsie City & Wappingers Falls Electric Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northrop v. Poughkeepsie City & Wappingers Falls Electric Railway Co., 74 A.D. 625, 77 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground of the error (folio 135 of the case) involved in the refusal of the court to charge that if the jury find that if the plaintiff had looked and listened, and by so doing he would have avoided the accident, then he cannot recover, although the defendant may also be guilty of negligence. All concurred, except Goodrich, P. J., who dissented on the ground that the previous portion of the charge properly instructed the jury, taken in connection with the modification stated by the court at the time of this request.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northrop v. Poughkeepsie City & Wappingers Falls Electric Railway Co.
93 N.Y.S. 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D. 625, 77 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northrop-v-poughkeepsie-city-wappingers-falls-electric-railway-co-nyappdiv-1902.