Northrop v. Minturn
13 Johns. 85
This text of 13 Johns. 85 (Northrop v. Minturn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Northrop v. Minturn, 13 Johns. 85 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).
Opinion
Supposing the true construction of the evidence to be, that part of the consideration of the note was for the use of a billiard table, in playing billiards at the house of Minturn ; yet, as there is no evidence that Minturn then kept a tavern, it was not an unlawful contract; there being no evidence that it was for money lost at play.
The judgment below must fee affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northrop-v-minturn-nysupct-1816.