Northrop Grumman Corporation
Opinion
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- ) ) Northrop Grumman Corporation ) ASBCA No. 61345 ) Under Contract No. NAS 15-10000 et al. )
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Stephen J. McBrady, Esq. Charles Baek, Esq. Crowell & Moring LLP Washington, DC
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. DCMA Chief Trial Attorney Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq. Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SHACKLEFORD
The parties have notified the Board that the contracting officer's final decision from which this appeal was taken has been rescinded, and jointly move to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. When a contracting officer unequivocally rescinds a government claim, the government's action moots the appeal, leaving the Board without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal further. Combat Support Assocs., ASBCA Nos. 58945, 58946, 16-1BCA136,288 at 176,974. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot.
Dated: September 19, 2019
RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
(Signatures continued) I concur I concur
OWEN C. WILSON 173~-- DAVID B. STINSON Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61345, Appeal ofNorthrop Grumman Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Dated:
PAULLAK. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Northrop Grumman Corporation (Northrop Grumman Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.