Northland Electrical Services, L.L.C. v. Car Credit, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Northland Electrical Services, L.L.C. v. Car Credit, Inc.

348 S.W.3d 148, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1221

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 20, 2011

DocketWD 73115

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 S.W.3d 148 (Northland Electrical Services, L.L.C. v. Car Credit, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northland Electrical Services, L.L.C. v. Car Credit, Inc., 348 S.W.3d 148, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1221 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Northland Electrical Services, LLC, appeals a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, following a bench trial, which found that Northland had failed to prove that an oral contract existed for the performance of electrical work between Northland and respondents Car Credit, Inc., and 2716 E 14th Street, LLC (collectively “Car Credit”). Having rejected Northland’s breach of contract theory, the trial court instead awarded Northland damages on its alternative quantum meruit claim. Northland asserts on appeal that it is undisputed that North-land and Car Credit had agreed to the essential terms of a contract, and that this case should therefore be remanded for a new trial on damages on its breach of contract claim. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Northland Electrical Services, LLC, appeals a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, following a bench trial, which found that Northland had failed to prove that an oral contract existed for the performance of electrical work between Northland and respondents Car Credit, Inc., and 2716 E 14th Street, LLC (collectively “Car Credit”). Having rejected Northland’s breach of contract theory, the trial court instead awarded Northland damages on its alternative quantum meruit claim. Northland asserts on appeal that it is undisputed that North-land and Car Credit had agreed to the essential terms of a contract, and that this case should therefore be remanded for a new trial on damages on its breach of contract claim. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 S.W.3d 148, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northland-electrical-services-llc-v-car-credit-inc-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack