Northfield Insurance v. Evian Horizontal Property Regime
This text of 68 F. App'x 487 (Northfield Insurance v. Evian Horizontal Property Regime) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants appeal the district court’s orders entering declaratory judgment for the insurer and denying the insureds’ motion for reconsideration. We previously granted Appellants’ unopposed motion to proceed without oral argument. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Northfield Ins. Co. v. Evian Horizontal Prop. Regime, No. CA-01-883-9-23 (D.S.C. Aug. 28 & Sept. 23, 2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 F. App'x 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northfield-insurance-v-evian-horizontal-property-regime-ca4-2003.