Northfield Insurance v. Evian Horizontal Property Regime

Fourth Circuit

Northfield Insurance v. Evian Horizontal Property Regime

68 F. App'x 487

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2003·No. No. 02-2249·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders entering declaratory judgment for the insurer and denying the insureds’ motion for reconsideration. We previously granted Appellants’ unopposed motion to proceed without oral argument. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Northfield Ins. Co. v. Evian Horizontal Prop. Regime, No. CA-01-883-9-23 (D.S.C. Aug. 28 & Sept. 23, 2002).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders entering declaratory judgment for the insurer and denying the insureds’ motion for reconsideration. We previously granted Appellants’ unopposed motion to proceed without oral argument. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Northfield Ins. Co. v. Evian Horizontal Prop. Regime, No. CA-01-883-9-23 (D.S.C. Aug. 28 & Sept. 23, 2002).

AFFIRMED.

Northfield Insurance v. Evian Horizontal Property Regime, 68 F. App'x 487 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

68 F. App'x 487 (Northfield Insurance v. Evian Horizontal Property Regime) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related