Northfield Development Co. v. City of Burlington
535 S.E.2d 32, 352 N.C. 671, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 744
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 6, 2000
DocketNo. 63A00
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 535 S.E.2d 32 (Northfield Development Co. v. City of Burlington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Northfield Development Co. v. City of Burlington, 535 S.E.2d 32, 352 N.C. 671, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 744 (N.C. 2000).
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petitions for discretionary review as to additional issues were improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
The Royal Oak Concerned Citizens Ass'n v. Brunswick Cnty.
756 S.E.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
The Royal Oak Concerned Citizens Ass'n v. Brunswick Cnty.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Guilford Financial Services, LLC v. City of Brevard
563 S.E.2d 27 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Devaney v. City of Burlington
545 S.E.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
535 S.E.2d 32, 352 N.C. 671, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northfield-development-co-v-city-of-burlington-nc-2000.