Northern v. State
394 So. 2d 522, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19564
Opinion
Affirmed. The prosecutor’s closing argument comments, which the jury was properly instructed to disregard, were not so per[523]*523nicious, in the context of this case, as to require that the defendant be granted a new trial. See Darden v. State, 329 So.2d 287 (Fla.1976), cert. dismissed, 430 U.S. 704, 97 S.Ct. 1671, 51 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977); Thomas v. State, 326 So.2d 413 (Fla.1976); Zamot v. State, 375 So.2d 881 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 348 So.2d 646 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); James v. State, 334 So.2d 83 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Northern v. State, 394 So. 2d 522, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
394 So. 2d 522 (Northern v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Darden v. Florida
430 U.S. 704 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Darden v. State
329 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Zamot v. State
375 So. 2d 881 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
James v. State
334 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Thomas v. State
326 So. 2d 413 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Johnson v. State
348 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)