Northern v. Nelson

315 F. Supp. 687, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10994
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedJuly 8, 1970
DocketC-69 279
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 315 F. Supp. 687 (Northern v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northern v. Nelson, 315 F. Supp. 687, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10994 (N.D. Cal. 1970).

Opinion

FINAL ORDER

ZIRPOLI, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court based on the civil rights complaint of *688 plaintiff, Harry X. Northern, against defendant, Louis S. Nelson, Warden, San Quentin State Prison.

Upon the record herein it appears:

1. That plaintiff had not been allowed to receive on a regular basis the newspaper Muhammad Speaks.

2. That eleven of the thirteen prison facilities hereinafter listed do not have copies of the book entitled The Holy Quran by Usef Ali.

3. That there are currently no provisions for payment by state authorities of a Muslim minister at a rate comparable to that which is paid to chaplains of the Catholic, Jewish and Protestant faiths.

4. That reasonable access to copies of Muhammad Speaks and The Holy Quran are at minimum necessary for effective exercise of plaintiff’s right to practice the Muslim religion.

5. That in the past availability of the newspaper Muhammad Speaks has not resulted in disruption of prison discipline.

6. That plaintiff received disciplinary infractions for the possession of Muhammad Speaks while in San Quentin.

7. That disciplinary infractions resulting from possession of Muhammad Speaks have been deleted from plaintiff’s prison records, and his complaint with regard to such infractions is therefore moot.

8. In light of the fact that a daily menu is posted and that the diet presently in use at state prison facilities is adequate to meet the dietary needs of all inmates at such facilities and as constituted does not unreasonably impinge upon the free exercise of the religious beliefs and practices of such inmates who adhere to the Muslim religion, the complaint as it relates to the prison diet is therefore moot.

Accordingly, pursuant to the Court’s opinion of June 22, 1970, it is ordered:

1. That plaintiff be allowed, to receive at his expense on a regular basis, the newspaper Muhammad Speaks unless

it can be clearly demonstrated that a specific issue will substantially disrupt prison discipline.

2. That, if not heretofore provided, the thirteen prison facilities hereinafter named shall make available to inmates requesting it and in accordance with Department of Corrections and institutional library rules which are uniformly applicable to all inmates, at least one copy of the book entitled The Holy Qu-ran by Usef Ali:

California Medical Facility, Vacaville Folsom State Prison, Represa
North Coast Conservation Center, Garberville
California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi
California Conservation Center, Susan-ville
Deuel Vocational Institution, Tracy Sierra Conservation Center, Jamestown
California Institution for Men, Chino Southern Conservation Center, Chino California State Prison, San Quentin California Men’s Colony, East Facility, San Luis Obispo
California Men’s Colony, Los Padres Correctional Training Facility, Soledad

3. That a Muslim minister, when available and otherwise authorized to perform religious services pursuant to and in accordance with Department of Corrections and institutional rules, shall be paid by the prison authorities at an hourly rate comparable to that which is paid to chaplains of the Catholic, Jewish and Protestant faiths.

4. That the prison facilities which have made available Muslim literature in addition to Muhammad Speaks and The Holy Qu-ran, shall not interpret this order to mean that such additional literature should be discarded.

5. The damages claimed (actual and punitive) by plaintiff are without substance or foundation to justify the granting thereof and the prayer therefor is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joe Lowell McElyea Jr. v. Governor Bruce Babbitt
833 F.2d 196 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Masjid Muhammad-D.C.C. v. Keve
479 F. Supp. 1311 (D. Delaware, 1979)
Jackson v. Ward
458 F. Supp. 546 (W.D. New York, 1978)
Procunier v. Navarette
434 U.S. 555 (Supreme Court, 1978)
In Re Serna
76 Cal. App. 3d 1010 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
Cochran v. Rowe
438 F. Supp. 566 (N.D. Illinois, 1977)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1977
United States v. Kahane
396 F. Supp. 687 (E.D. New York, 1975)
Frazier v. Donelon
381 F. Supp. 911 (E.D. Louisiana, 1974)
Battle v. Anderson
376 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1974)
Lovern v. Cox
374 F. Supp. 32 (W.D. Virginia, 1974)
Harry Northern v. Louis S. Nelson
448 F.2d 1266 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
Clutchette v. Procunier
328 F. Supp. 767 (N.D. California, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 F. Supp. 687, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-v-nelson-cand-1970.