Northern Trust Co. v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Northern Trust Co. v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.

552 So. 2d 1123, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2317, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 1989·No. Nos. 86-2954, 86-3083 and 88-3074·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER ENFORCING MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

The trial court was entirely correct in entering final judgment for the insurer upon the opinion and mandate in Provident Life & Acc. Ins. v. Leonard, 526 So.2d 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) because the effect of our reversal of the original final summary judgment and affirmance of the cross-appeal necessarily foreclosed all issues embraced in the counterclaims of the insured. For this reason, we deny the insured’s motion to review order enforcing the mandate of this court.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER ENFORCING MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

The trial court was entirely correct in entering final judgment for the insurer upon the opinion and mandate in Provident Life & Acc. Ins. v. Leonard, 526 So.2d 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) because the effect of our reversal of the original final summary judgment and affirmance of the cross-appeal necessarily foreclosed all issues embraced in the counterclaims of the insured. For this reason, we deny the insured’s motion to review order enforcing the mandate of this court.

Motion denied.

Northern Trust Co. v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co., 552 So. 2d 1123, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2317, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

552 So. 2d 1123 (Northern Trust Co. v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related