Northern Trust Bank of Florida, N.A. v. Rosefsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Northern Trust Bank of Florida, N.A. v. Rosefsky

554 So. 2d 583, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7219, 1989 WL 153751

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1989

DocketNo. 89-347

StatusPublished

This text of 554 So. 2d 583 (Northern Trust Bank of Florida, N.A. v. Rosefsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northern Trust Bank of Florida, N.A. v. Rosefsky, 554 So. 2d 583, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7219, 1989 WL 153751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s finding by clear and convincing evidence¹ that Rosefsky effected a valid, unconditional gift to his wife is supported by ample competent evidence in the record. See Winner v. Winner, 370 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Hence, it may not be disturbed on appeal. Strawgate v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112, 1113 (Fla.1976); City of Miami Beach v. Sussman, 376 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Placet, Inc. v. Ashton, 368 So.2d 404, 409 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 343, 347 (Fla.1979).

There was likewise no error in the denial of the appellant’s motion for new trial based on allegedly newly discovered evi[584]*584dence. 38 Fla.Jur.2d New Trial §§ 63, 65 (1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s finding by clear and convincing evidence¹ that Rosefsky effected a valid, unconditional gift to his wife is supported by ample competent evidence in the record. See Winner v. Winner, 370 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Hence, it may not be disturbed on appeal. Strawgate v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112, 1113 (Fla.1976); City of Miami Beach v. Sussman, 376 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Placet, Inc. v. Ashton, 368 So.2d 404, 409 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 343, 347 (Fla.1979).

There was likewise no error in the denial of the appellant’s motion for new trial based on allegedly newly discovered evi[584]*584dence. 38 Fla.Jur.2d New Trial §§ 63, 65 (1982).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 So. 2d 583, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7219, 1989 WL 153751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-trust-bank-of-florida-na-v-rosefsky-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack