Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Adams

241 S.W. 275, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 831
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 28, 1922·No. No. 2549.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LEVY, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The appellant asked and the court refused to submit the issue of accident or unavoidable injury. Error is predicated on the refusal to submit this requested issue. The appellant specially pleaded accident, and the evidence sufficiently raised, we conclude, the question of unavoidable happening of the collision. According to the late case of Railway Co. v. Ada Rowe (Com. App.) 238 S. W. 908, the refusal to submit such question for find-, ing by the jury is reversible error.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for another trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Adams, 241 S.W. 275, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 831 (Tex. Ct. App. 1922).

241 S.W. 275 (Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Woodrum Truck Lines
36 S.W.2d 1090 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Armour
290 S.W. 544 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)