Northern School Supply Co. v. Ferche, Bauman

Montana Supreme Court

Northern School Supply Co. v. Ferche, Bauman

155 P.2d 621, 115 Mont. 605, 1944 Mont. LEXIS 16

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1944

DocketNo. 8463.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 P.2d 621 (Northern School Supply Co. v. Ferche, Bauman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northern School Supply Co. v. Ferche, Bauman, 155 P.2d 621, 115 Mont. 605, 1944 Mont. LEXIS 16 (Mo. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The transcript on appeal having been filed herein on August 26, 1943, and thereafter, on November 4, 1943, the bill of exceptions having been stricken therefrom for the reason that it was not served and filed within the time allowed by law; and the respondents having on March 25, 1944, filed their motion to dismiss the appeal herein bearing appellant’s admission of service and consent that it might be presented to this court at any time without further notice to appellant; and the appeal brief of appellant disclosing that the appellant’s only specifications of error are (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to admit certain evidence, and (2) that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the evidence, neither of which issues can be considered in the absence of the bill of exceptions, it is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The transcript on appeal having been filed herein on August 26, 1943, and thereafter, on November 4, 1943, the bill of exceptions having been stricken therefrom for the reason that it was not served and filed within the time allowed by law; and the respondents having on March 25, 1944, filed their motion to dismiss the appeal herein bearing appellant’s admission of service and consent that it might be presented to this court at any time without further notice to appellant; and the appeal brief of appellant disclosing that the appellant’s only specifications of error are (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to admit certain evidence, and (2) that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the evidence, neither of which issues can be considered in the absence of the bill of exceptions, it is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 P.2d 621, 115 Mont. 605, 1944 Mont. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-school-supply-co-v-ferche-bauman-mont-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack