Northern R. Co. of New Hampshire v. Ogdensburg & L. C. R. Co.
This text of 20 F. 347 (Northern R. Co. of New Hampshire v. Ogdensburg & L. C. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Both parties being of opinion that it is more regular to file a cross-bill than to bring up the proposed reformation of the [348]*348contract by way of answer to the original bill in Ogdensburg & L. C. R. Co. v. Northern R. Co. of N. H. 5 Fed. Rep. 880, the plaintiffs in this case are hereby permitted to file their cross-bill, on terms that if they shall succeed in reforming the contract, and thereby prevail in the litigation, they shall, take no costs to this time, and shall pay the costs in the original suit up to this time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 F. 347, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-r-co-of-new-hampshire-v-ogdensburg-l-c-r-co-uscirct-1884.