Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
102 S. Ct. 1703
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 458 U.S. 50 →
Opinion
Facts and opinion, In the Matter of Northern Pipeline Construction Company, Bkrtcy., 6 B.R. 928; D.C., 12 B.R. 946.
The motion of Beneficial Corporation for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time for argument is denied. The motion of Commercial Law League of America to reconsider order denying motion for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time for argument is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 102 S. Ct. 1703 (U.S. 1982).
102 S. Ct. 1703 (Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co. (In Re Northern Pipeline Construction Co.)
6 B.R. 928 (D. Minnesota, 1980)
Marathon Pipeline Co. v. Northern Pipeline Construction Co.
12 B.R. 946 (D. Minnesota, 1981)