Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Tuttle
154 P. 796, 89 Wash. 699, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 708
This text of 154 P. 796 (Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Tuttle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Tuttle, 154 P. 796, 89 Wash. 699, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 708 (Wash. 1916).
Opinion
This case presents the same legal question involving the right of adverse possession of respondent’s right of way as presented in Northern-Pac. R. Co. v. Concannon, 239 U. S. 382. The question being a Federal one, the cited case is controlling.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonald
157 P. 222 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
154 P. 796, 89 Wash. 699, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-pacific-railway-co-v-tuttle-wash-1916.