Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Tuttle
154 P. 796, 89 Wash. 699, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 708
Opinion
This case presents the same legal question involving the right of adverse possession of respondent’s right of way as presented in Northern-Pac. R. Co. v. Concannon, 239 U. S. 382. The question being a Federal one, the cited case is controlling.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Tuttle, 154 P. 796, 89 Wash. 699, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 708 (Wash. 1916).
154 P. 796 (Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Tuttle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonald
157 P. 222 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)