Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Concannon
This text of 165 P. 657 (Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Concannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.
— Upon the facts as stated in the opinion filed in this court on October 7, 1913, 75 Wash. 591, 135 Pac. 652, and after reargument upon the record, we affirm the finding of the trial judge that respondent Concannon had acquired title to that part of the right of way of appellant now occupied by him, by adverse possession prior to the 28th day of April, 1904.
The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Note: Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Concannon, 239 U. S. 382.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 P. 657, 96 Wash. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-pacific-railway-co-v-concannon-wash-1917.