Northern Pacific Railroad v. Strong

North Dakota Supreme Court

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Strong

51 N.W. 787, 2 N.D. 395, 1892 N.D. LEXIS 29

DecidedJanuary 12, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 51 N.W. 787 (Northern Pacific Railroad v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Strong, 51 N.W. 787, 2 N.D. 395, 1892 N.D. LEXIS 29 (N.D. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Winchester, J.

Following the case of Bailroad Co. v. Barnes, ante (decided at this term), the judgment of the district court is reversed.

McConnell, J., concurs. Corliss, C. J., dissents. [396]*396Bartholomew and Wallin, JJ., having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of the above-entitled action, nor take any part in the opinion; Judge Winchester, of the sixth judicial district, and Judge McConnell, of the third judicial district, sitting by request in their places.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Winchester, J.

Following the case of Bailroad Co. v. Barnes, ante (decided at this term), the judgment of the district court is reversed.

McConnell, J., concurs. Corliss, C. J., dissents. [396]*396Bartholomew and Wallin, JJ., having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of the above-entitled action, nor take any part in the opinion; Judge Winchester, of the sixth judicial district, and Judge McConnell, of the third judicial district, sitting by request in their places.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 N.W. 787, 2 N.D. 395, 1892 N.D. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-pacific-railroad-v-strong-nd-1892.