Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Palmer

125 F. 1004, 60 C.C.A. 690, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4269
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 1903
DocketNo. 919
StatusPublished

This text of 125 F. 1004 (Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Palmer, 125 F. 1004, 60 C.C.A. 690, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4269 (9th Cir. 1903).

Opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington. James F.’McElroy and B. S. Grosscup, for plaintiff in error. James Hamilton Lewis, for defendant in error. Pursuant to stipulation of counsel, cause dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 F. 1004, 60 C.C.A. 690, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-pac-ry-co-v-palmer-ca9-1903.