Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. City of Akron

Ohio Supreme Court

Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. City of Akron

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 382

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 24, 1914

DocketNo. 14024

StatusPublished

This text of 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 382 (Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. City of Akron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. City of Akron, 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 382 (Ohio 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

Journal entry: It appearing from the record in this case that the question as to the amount of the fair and reasonable proportion of the cost of the construction of the improvement that the plaintiff in error should pay was properly and fairly sub[383]*383mitted to the jury in this case, regardless of the amount named in the ordinance passed by the city council of the City of Akron, Ohio, and that the jury by its verdict fixed and determined that amount independent of the amount fixed in the ordinance, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court be, and the same hereby is, affirmed. ■— Reporter.

Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed.

Journal entry: It appearing from the record in this case that the question as to the amount of the fair and reasonable proportion of the cost of the construction of the improvement that the plaintiff in error should pay was properly and fairly sub[383]*383mitted to the jury in this case, regardless of the amount named in the ordinance passed by the city council of the City of Akron, Ohio, and that the jury by its verdict fixed and determined that amount independent of the amount fixed in the ordinance, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court be, and the same hereby is, affirmed. ■— Reporter.

Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-ohio-traction-light-co-v-city-of-akron-ohio-1914.