Northern Metal Co. v. Maier

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Northern Metal Co. v. Maier

11 A.2d 140, 337 Pa. 257, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 395

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1940·No. Appeal, 67·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is, from a decree restraining defendant from trading under the name “Great Northern. Metal Co.” or any other name deceptively similar to plain *258 tiff’s trade name “Northern Metal Company”. The evidence supports the findings of fact made by the learned chancellor, approved by the court in banc; the decree must therefore be affirmed. See, generally, Geffen v. Baltimore Markets, Inc., 325 Pa. 509, at page 515, 191 A. 24; Restatement, Torts, sections 716, 717, 727 et seq. Costs to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This appeal is, from a decree restraining defendant from trading under the name “Great Northern. Metal Co.” or any other name deceptively similar to plain *258 tiff’s trade name “Northern Metal Company”. The evidence supports the findings of fact made by the learned chancellor, approved by the court in banc; the decree must therefore be affirmed. See, generally, Geffen v. Baltimore Markets, Inc., 325 Pa. 509, at page 515, 191 A. 24; Restatement, Torts, sections 716, 717, 727 et seq. Costs to be paid by appellant.

Northern Metal Co. v. Maier, 11 A.2d 140, 337 Pa. 257, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 395 (Pa. 1940).

Pincite

11 A.2d 140 (Northern Metal Co. v. Maier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related