Northern Homes Distributors, Inc. v. Grosch

580 A.2d 58, 216 Conn. 810, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 343
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 18, 1990·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 93, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Should the Appellate Court have affirmed the dismissal of the defendant’s counterclaims against the plaintiff Northern Homes Distributors, Inc., on the ground that the same claims were raised in a prior pending action brought by the defendant against the other plaintiffs involved in the transaction from which this litigation arose?
“2. Should the Appellate Court have affirmed the dismissal of the counterclaim against the plaintiff Donald Ghent as the ‘alter ego or instrumentality’ of the plaintiff Northern Homes Distributors, Inc., which was not raised in the prior pending action?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northern Homes Distributors, Inc. v. Grosch, 580 A.2d 58, 216 Conn. 810, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 343 (Colo. 1990).

580 A.2d 58 (Northern Homes Distributors, Inc. v. Grosch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northern Homes Distributors, Inc. v. Grosch
575 A.2d 711 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)