Northern Central Railway Co. v. Rutledge

41 Md. 372, 1875 Md. LEXIS 54
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 9, 1875·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Miller, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

After a careful consideration of the question arising on this appeal, a majority of the Court are of opinion a cause cannot be removed for trial, after a judgment by default has been rendered therein, and for the reasons stated by the learned Judge of the Superior Court, in his opinion contained in the record, and accompanying the order [380]*380appealed from. That order is therefore affirmed, and the cause remanded to the Superior Court, that it may he carried into effect.

(Decided 9th February, 1875.)

Order affirmed, and cause remanded.

Alvjsy, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northern Central Railway Co. v. Rutledge, 41 Md. 372, 1875 Md. LEXIS 54 (Md. 1875).

41 Md. 372 (Northern Central Railway Co. v. Rutledge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cobourn
179 A. 512 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1935)
Mayor of Baltimore v. Libowitz
149 A. 449 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1930)
Schaible v. Home Insurance
105 A. 165 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1918)
Mayor of Baltimore v. Kane
93 A. 393 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1915)
Rice v. West
42 Md. 614 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1875)