Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd

Supreme Court

Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd

270 U.S. 625, 46 S. Ct. 204

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 18, 1926·No. No. 729; No. 730; No. 731·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Gray’s Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Ford[626]*626ney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S, 18, 19.

Mr. Dallas v. Halverstadt for plaintiffs,in error. Mr. John H. Dunbar for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Gray’s Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Ford[626]*626ney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S, 18, 19.

Mr. Dallas v. Halverstadt for plaintiffs,in error. Mr. John H. Dunbar for defendants in error.

Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd, 270 U.S. 625, 46 S. Ct. 204 (1926).

Pincite

270 U.S. 625 (Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related