Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd

270 U.S. 625, 46 S. Ct. 204
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 18, 1926
DocketNo. 729; No. 730; No. 731
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 U.S. 625 (Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd, 270 U.S. 625, 46 S. Ct. 204 (1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Gray’s Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Ford[626]*626ney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S, 18, 19.

Mr. Dallas v. Halverstadt for plaintiffs,in error. Mr. John H. Dunbar for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Mensi
283 U.S. 791 (Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 U.S. 625, 46 S. Ct. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-cedar-co-v-gloyd-scotus-1926.