Northeastern Rural Electric Me v. Wabash Valley Power Associati

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 29, 2013

Before

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

JOHN D. TINDER, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge No. 12-2037

NORTHEASTERN RURAL ELECTRIC Appeal from the United States District Court MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, for the Southern District of Indiana, Plaintiff-Appellant, Indianapolis Division.

v. No. 1:11-cv-00144-SEB-DML

WABASH VALLEY POWER Sarah Evans Barker, ASSOCIATION, Judge. Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc, filed on March 8, 2013 , all judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing, and no judge in active service has requested a vote for rehearing en banc.

Accordingly, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

On page three of the slip opinion issued February 22, 2013, the third sentence of the new, full paragraph is hereby AMENDED as follows:

The denial of a motion to remand ordinarily cannot be appealed provide a basis for appellate jurisdiction before a final judgment, see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)1292, but here we have jurisdiction over the denial of the motion to remand because it is “inextricably intertwined” with the appealable preliminary injunction.

As amended, the sentence shall now read:

The denial of a motion to remand ordinarily cannot provide a basis for appellate jurisdiction before a final judgment, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292, but here we have jurisdiction over the denial of the motion to remand because it is “inextricably intertwined” with the appealable preliminary injunction.