Northcutt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Northcutt v. State

1911 OK CR 216, 114 P. 1132, 5 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 142

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 18, 1911·No. No. A-392.·Published

Opinion

■PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in 'error was convicted in the county court of Cleveland county on the 22d day of January, 1909, on a charge of disturbing relig.ous worship and has perfected his appeal in this court. On the 9th day of January, 1911, the Attorney General filed a confession of error in this case admitting that the trial court erred in i'ts instruction to the jury on the credibility of the defendant as a witness in his own behalf. The- confession of error is weil taken, and is sustained. The cause is reversed and remanded to the county court of Cleveland county With directions to that court to grant the ■plaintiff in error a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in 'error was convicted in the county court of Cleveland county on the 22d day of January, 1909, on a charge of disturbing relig.ous worship and has perfected his appeal in this court. On the 9th day of January, 1911, the Attorney General filed a confession of error in this case admitting that the trial court erred in i'ts instruction to the jury on the credibility of the defendant as a witness in his own behalf. The- confession of error is weil taken, and is sustained. The cause is reversed and remanded to the county court of Cleveland county With directions to that court to grant the ■plaintiff in error a new trial.

Northcutt v. State, 1911 OK CR 216, 114 P. 1132, 5 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 142 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK CR 216 (Northcutt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.