Northcutt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Northcutt v. State

1911 OK CR 216, 114 P. 1132, 5 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 142

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 18, 1911

DocketNo. A-392.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 216 (Northcutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Northcutt v. State, 1911 OK CR 216, 114 P. 1132, 5 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 142 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

■PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in 'error was convicted in the county court of Cleveland county on the 22d day of January, 1909, on a charge of disturbing relig.ous worship and has perfected his appeal in this court. On the 9th day of January, 1911, the Attorney General filed a confession of error in this case admitting that the trial court erred in i'ts instruction to the jury on the credibility of the defendant as a witness in his own behalf. The- confession of error is weil taken, and is sustained. The cause is reversed and remanded to the county court of Cleveland county With directions to that court to grant the ■plaintiff in error a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in 'error was convicted in the county court of Cleveland county on the 22d day of January, 1909, on a charge of disturbing relig.ous worship and has perfected his appeal in this court. On the 9th day of January, 1911, the Attorney General filed a confession of error in this case admitting that the trial court erred in i'ts instruction to the jury on the credibility of the defendant as a witness in his own behalf. The- confession of error is weil taken, and is sustained. The cause is reversed and remanded to the county court of Cleveland county With directions to that court to grant the ■plaintiff in error a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 216, 114 P. 1132, 5 Okla. Crim. 696, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northcutt-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.