Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor

832 P.2d 52, 113 Or. App. 748, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1356
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 1, 1992
DocketWCB 89-14670; CA A68207
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 832 P.2d 52 (Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor, 832 P.2d 52, 113 Or. App. 748, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1356 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that denied him attorney fees to be paid by SAIF in addition to compensation. SAIF concedes that the Board erred under the 1991 amendment to ORS 656.386(1). We agree with SAIF’s concession.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Saif Corp.
834 P.2d 551 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
832 P.2d 52, 113 Or. App. 748, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northcutt-v-bjs-ice-cream-parlor-orctapp-1992.