Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor

832 P.2d 52, 113 Or. App. 748, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1356
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 1, 1992·No. WCB 89-14670; CA A68207·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that denied him attorney fees to be paid by SAIF in addition to compensation. SAIF concedes that the Board erred under the 1991 amendment to ORS 656.386(1). We agree with SAIF’s concession.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor, 832 P.2d 52, 113 Or. App. 748, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1356 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

832 P.2d 52 (Northcutt v. Bj's Ice Cream Parlor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes v. Saif Corp.
834 P.2d 551 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)