Northcoate v. Bachelder
111 Mass. 322
Opinion
The question of the defendants’ liability in this action was properly submitted to the jury, under instructions accurately stated, carefully guarded, and conformed to the decisions of this court. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co. 102 Mass. 572. Huddleston v. Lowell Machine Shop, 106 Mass. 282. There was nothing in the evidence in the case to call for any instruction as to an internal or hidden defect in the barrel, and all the other instructions requested were fully covered by the instructions given. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Northcoate v. Bachelder, 111 Mass. 322 (Mass. 1873).
111 Mass. 322 (Northcoate v. Bachelder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warner v. Oriel Glass Company
8 S.W.2d 846 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)
Clements v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad
127 Ala. 166 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
Leigh v. Omaha Street Railway Co.
54 N.W. 134 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1893)
Indiana Car Co. v. Parker
100 Ind. 181 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)