Northampton County v. Easton Passenger Railway Co.

23 A. 895, 148 Pa. 282, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 971
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 28, 1892
DocketAppeal, No. 292
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 23 A. 895 (Northampton County v. Easton Passenger Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northampton County v. Easton Passenger Railway Co., 23 A. 895, 148 Pa. 282, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 971 (Pa. 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Were we to go outside of the case stated, we might find some difficulty in affirming this judgment. But it is there expressly agreed “ that the said lot and stables, and the said horses, cars and- vehicles are used only in and about the business of conveying passengers and produce, according to the defendant’s corporate powers, and that they are appurtenant, necessary and indispensable therefor.” This agreement, in regard to the facts, clearly brings the case within the ruling in West Chester Gas Company v. The County of Chester, 30 Pa. 232; The County of Erie v. The Western Transportation Company, 87 Pa. 434; and the Coatesville Gas Company v. The County of Chester, 97 Pa. 476, in which it was held that the property of canal and railroad companies, and other quasi public corporations, necessary for the exercise of their several franchises, as depots, toll houses and water stations, is not taxable for local purposes. The reason given for this exemption is, that these things enter into the very composition of the works of these corporations, and without; which they could not exercise their corporate functions.

We need not pursue the subject further. Under the facts as agreed upon, the plaintiff has no case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc. v. Rankin
96 A.2d 870 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
City of Easton v. Leeds
4 Pa. D. & C. 723 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Commonwealth ex rel. Weimer v. Caldwell
2 Pa. D. & C. 195 (Cambria County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Conoy Township Supervisors v. York Haven Electric Power Plant Co.
71 A. 207 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Andrus v. Shippen Township
36 Pa. Super. 22 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
City of Philadelphia ex rel. Pugh v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad
1 Pa. Super. 236 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A. 895, 148 Pa. 282, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northampton-county-v-easton-passenger-railway-co-pa-1892.