Northampton County Drainage District Number One v. Bailey

378 S.E.2d 796, 324 N.C. 336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Northampton County Drainage District Number One v. Bailey. Read the opinion of the Court — 326 N.C. 742
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 5, 1989·No. No. 576A88·Published

Opinion

Ex mero motu, the Court hereby withdraws its order of 4 January 1989, 323 N.C. 705, insofar as it dismissed the defendants’ appeal based upon the existence of a substantial constitutional question, as provided by G.S. 7A-30.

Accordingly, the Defendants’ new brief, limited in scope to the issue which was the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the constitutional question presented in the notice of appeal, filed in this Court on 14 December 1988, and the issue relating to attorney fees, presented in the petition for discretionary review and as specified in this Court’s order of 4 January 1989, shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

By order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of April 1989.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northampton County Drainage District Number One v. Bailey, 378 S.E.2d 796, 324 N.C. 336 (N.C. 1989).

378 S.E.2d 796 (Northampton County Drainage District Number One v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.