Northam v. F. J. Lewis Manufacturing Co.

208 Ill. App. 229
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 30, 1917
DocketGen. No. 23,107
StatusPublished

This text of 208 Ill. App. 229 (Northam v. F. J. Lewis Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northam v. F. J. Lewis Manufacturing Co., 208 Ill. App. 229 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Brokers—when brolcer entitled to commission although lease not carried out. Where a contract between a car manufacturing company and a broker provided that the former would pay the broker as commission for leasing a certain number of cars the amount for which the cars were leased in excess of a certain amount per month, and the broker procured a lessor who agreed to pay a rental in excess of the amount charged by the company, the broker’s commissions were earned when the cars were leased, and he was entitled to his compensation without regard to whether, the lease was carried out. 2. Assumpsit, Action ok, § 95*—when judgment in action brought under common counts not reversed. A judgment will not be reversed because the action was brought under the common counts, where it was brought for services rendered, and there was an affidavit of merits disclosing the nature of the claim, a plea of nonassumpsit in the affidavit of merits and no objection was made to the introduction of the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 Ill. App. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northam-v-f-j-lewis-manufacturing-co-illappct-1917.